Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States First Circuit


NADEAU v. MATESANZ, 01-2288

Habeas petitioner's arguments, that: 1) the trial judge's instructions to the jury violated his constitutional right to present a defense and to have his guilt determined by a jury of his peers; and, 2) the appellate court erred when it chose merely to vacate the convictions for possession of stolen property, and should instead have ordered a new trial, both denied.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/30/2002
  • Published 04/30/2002

Judges

  • STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge., Before SELYA, Circuit Judge, STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge, and LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

Court

  • United States First Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Paul M. Freitas for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Linda A. Wagner, Assistant Attorney General, with whom Thomas F. Reilly, Attorney General, was on brief, for appellee.
Copied to clipboard