United States First Circuit

Where jury returned a special verdict for the defendant-employer on sexual harassment claims, finding that the plaintiff had been subject to sexual harassment by an employee of the defendant but not through conduct warranting liability, because plaintiff's objections to faulty jury instructions were not adequately preserved, and instructions did not rise to the level of plain error, judgment was affirmed.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/18/2002
• Published 04/18/2002

Judges

• BOUDIN, Chief Judge., Before BOUDIN, Chief Judge, LYNCH, Circuit Judge, and GERTNER, U.S. District Judge.

Court

• United States First Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Mark D. Stern with whom Mark D. Stern, P.C. was on brief for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Brian H. Lamkin with whom Timothy P. Van Dyck, Edwards & Angell, LLP, Dorothy Pitt and Pitt, Fenton & Smith were on brief for appellee.