Skip to main content

United States First Circuit


DANDURAND v. UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERICA, 01-2204

Where the recurrent disability provisions of the long-term disability policy under which the plaintiff was covered were silent as to whether his disability should be treated as new or continuation of a prior disability, it was unreasonable for insurer to classify the recurrent condition as a new disability, and its calculations regarding insured's status and benefits thereafter were also unreasonable.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/02/2002
  • Published 04/02/2002

Judges

  • STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge., Before TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge, STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge, and LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

Court

  • United States First Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Graydon G. Stevens, with whom Kelly, Remmel & Zimmerman, was on brief, for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Ronald W. Schneider, with whom Patricia A. Peard and Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, were on brief, for appellee.
Copied to clipboard