Skip to main content

United States First Circuit


INVEST ALMAZ v. TEMPLE-INLAND FOREST PRODS. CORP., 00-1340

Where plaintiff did not introduce evidence that defendant received more than it was owed or that certain property had been valued improperly, there was no "enrichment" to justify plaintiff's claims of unjust enrichment.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/16/2001
  • Published 03/16/2001

Judges

  • STAHL, Circuit Judge., Before BOUDIN, Circuit Judge, BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge, and STAHL, Circuit Judge.

Court

  • United States First Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Mark H. Alcott, with whom John F. Baughman and Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, were on brief, for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Russell F. Hilliard, with whom Charles W. Grau and Upton, Sanders & Smith, were on brief, for appellees.
Copied to clipboard