United States First Circuit
INVEST ALMAZ v. TEMPLE-INLAND FOREST PRODS. CORP., 00-1340
Where plaintiff did not introduce evidence that defendant received more than it was owed or that certain property had been valued improperly, there was no "enrichment" to justify plaintiff's claims of unjust enrichment.
Appellate Information
- Decided 03/16/2001
- Published 03/16/2001
Judges
- STAHL, Circuit Judge., Before BOUDIN, Circuit Judge, BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge, and STAHL, Circuit Judge.
Court
- United States First Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Mark H. Alcott, with whom John F. Baughman and Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, were on brief, for appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Russell F. Hilliard, with whom Charles W. Grau and Upton, Sanders & Smith, were on brief, for appellees.