United States Eleventh Circuit

Defendants' convictions and sentences for engaging in multiple child-pornography offenses are affirmed in part where the statute of conviction for engaging in a child exploitation enterprise, 18 U.S.C. section 2252A(g), was not unconstitutionally vague. However, the court reversed in part where the court of appeals agreed with the government’s concession of error that the defendants’ convictions for both engaging in a child exploitation enterprise and for a conspiracy premised on the same acts was impermissible.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/26/2010
• Published 10/26/2010

Judges

• Thomas M. Reavley

Court

• United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel