United States Eleventh Circuit
US v. Chirino-Alvarez, 09-11317
Defendant's convictions and sentence for unlawfully smuggling three aliens into the United States are affirmed where: 1) from the totality of the evidence, including defendant's conversations with and admissions to an undercover customs agent, a jury could reasonably infer that defendant was involved with the scheme throughout; and 2) when, as here, the district court correctly imposes a statutory mandatory minimum sentence that is greater than a defendant’s Guidelines range, any error in the guidelines calculations is harmless.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/23/2010
- Published 08/23/2010
Judges
Court
- United States Eleventh Circuit