United States Eleventh Circuit

Defendant's sentence following the revocation of his supervised release after his child pornography conviction is affirmed where: 1) it was not necessary for a special condition to be supported by each section 3553(a) factor; rather, each factor was an independent consideration to be weighed; 2) the Internet ban condition was not a greater deprivation of liberty than reasonably necessary; and 3) defendant did not meet his burden to show his 24-month sentence was procedurally or substantively unreasonable.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/27/2010
• Published 07/27/2010

Judges

• Frank M. Hull

Court

• United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel