United States Eleventh Circuit

In a creditor's appeal from a bankruptcy court's order holding that the motion filed by debtor seeking to vacate the Consent Order was not barred under Rule 9024, the order is reversed where the bankruptcy court erred in holding that an order resolving a claim that has been objected to, but not litigated, constitutes an order "entered without a contest" for the purposes of Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9024.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/08/2010
• Published 07/09/2010

Judges

• William Henry Barbour, Jr.

Court

• United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel