United States Eleventh Circuit
Vining v. Sec'y, Dept. of Corr., 07-15681
In a capital habeas matter, the denial of petitioner's petition is affirmed where: 1) no extra-record materials that the trial judge viewed were presented to the jury during the guilt or penalty phases; 2) the trial judge's experience with hypnosis, conversations with a psychologist, or familiarity with a book on the subject did not influence the jury or prejudice the petitioner because, according to Florida law, the witnesses' testimony would have been admissible in any event; and 3) petitioner failed to demonstrate either deficient performance or prejudice in his ineffective assistance claims.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/28/2010
- Published 06/28/2010
Judges
- Per Curiam
Court
- United States Eleventh Circuit