Skip to main content

United States Eleventh Circuit


Rehberg v. Paulk, 09-11897

In an action for malicious prosecution, retaliatory investigation and prosecution, and evidence fabrication, a denial of defendants' motion to dismiss based on absolute and qualified immunity is affirmed in part where plaintiff sufficiently alleged the requisite retaliatory motive, absence of probable cause, and but-for causation to state a retaliatory prosecution claim. However, the order is reversed in part where: 1) even if defendants knew one defendant's testimony before a grand jury was false, they still received absolute immunity for the act of testifying to the grand jury; and 2) plaintiff's voluntary delivery of emails to third parties constituted a voluntary relinquishment of the right to privacy in that information.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/11/2010
  • Published 03/11/2010

Judges

Court

  • United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

Copied to clipboard