United States Eleventh Circuit
Southern Grouts & Mortars, Inc. v. 3M Co., 08-15850
In an action for cybersquatting on a domain name identical to the name of plaintiff's product, summary judgment for Defendant is affirmed where 1) the district court did not err in denying plaintiff leave to amend its complaint, because it waited to file a motion to amend its complaint with information it had known over a month before when it filed a motion for summary judgment; and 2) plaintiff failed to show that defendant had a bad faith intent to profit from using the domain name.
Appellate Information
- Decided 07/23/2009
- Published 07/23/2009
Judges
- PER CURIAM:, Before CARNES, HULL and COX, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eleventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Gustavo Sardina, Frank Herrera, JanPaul Guzman, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Mark A. Romance, Ethan Wall, Richman Greer, P.A., Miami, FL, Laura J. Hein, Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, Hildy Bowbeer, 3M Office of Intellectual Property Counsel, St. Paul, MN, for Defendant-Appellee.