United States Eleventh Circuit

Defendant's child pornography conviction and sentence are affirmed, where 1) defendant did not show that his expert witness's methodology was a sufficiently reliable identification technique; and 2) defendant's proffered testimony that child pornography cases usually involve multiple children would have been cumulative.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/23/2009
• Published 07/23/2009

Judges

• HULL, Circuit Judge:, Before CARNES, HULL and COX, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Terrence Edward Kehoe, Law Offices of Terrence E. Kehoe, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant., Roberta Josephina Bodnar, Peggy Morris Ronca, AUSA, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.