United States Eleventh Circuit

Defendant's child pornography conviction and sentence are affirmed, where: 1) the District Court properly excluded a defense expert's testimony because no record evidence explained the expert's methodology; and 2) government witnesses testified that child pornography cases usually involve multiple images of multiple children and Defendant had no such images, so additional testimony to that effect from Defendant's expert would have been cumulative.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/16/2009
• Published 06/16/2009

Judges

• HULL, Circuit Judge:, Before CARNES, HULL and COX, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Terrence Edward Kehoe, Law Offices of Terrence E. Kehoe, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant., Roberta Josephina Bodnar, Peggy Morris Ronca, AUSA, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.