United States Eleventh Circuit

In an action for fraudulent transfer of assets, Defendants' appeal from the District Court's order granting Plaintiff leave to file a Fourth Amended Complaint is dismissed, where: 1) the order was not effectively unreviewable on appeal; and thus 2) the Court of Appeals lacked subject matter jurisdiction.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/29/2009
• Published 04/29/2009

Judges

• ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:, Before MARCUS, ANDERSON and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Mac M. Moorer, Lightfoot, Franklin & White, LLC, Jay M. Ezelle, Michael A. Florie, Starnes & Atchison, LLP, Stephen A. Rowe, Adams & Reese, LLP, Robert Howard Rutherford, Burr & Forman, Birmingham, AL, Howard B. Levi, Levi, Lubarsky & Feigenbaum, LLP, Bruce D. Angiolillo, James G. Gamble, Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett, LLP, Bruce Birenboim, Farrah R. Berse, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP, New York City, Julia Leigh Tarver Mason, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP, Washington, DC, Earl M. Forte, III, Blank, Rome, Comisky & McCauley, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendants-Appellants., Timothy J. Paris, Leo R. Beus, Quinton F. Seamons, Thomas T. Griffin, Beus & Gilbert, PLLC, Scottsdale, AZ, James Timothy Francis, James L. North, North & Associates, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.