United States Eleventh Circuit

In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action based on Defendants' impoundment of Plaintiff's horses, summary judgment for Defendants based on qualified immunity is affirmed, where due process did not require Plaintiff to receive a hearing before the impoundment, or personal notice of her right to a hearing.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/09/2009
• Published 03/09/2009

Judges

• BIRCH, Circuit Judge:, Before BIRCH and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN, District Judge.

Court

• United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• William Middleton Droze, Troutman Sanders, Atlanta, GA, for Reams.


• For Appellees:
  
• Ralph Williams Ellis, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees.