United States Eleventh Circuit

Sentences for child pornography-related offenses are affirmed where the district court did not err in enhancing defendant's sentences pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 2252A(b)(1) and (b)(2) based on a 1991 nolo contendere plea with adjudication withheld to Florida charges related to possession of child pornography.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/24/2008
• Published 03/24/2008

Judges

• PER CURIAM:, Before ANDERSON, BLACK and HULL, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• H. “Ed” Ellis, Jr., Staples, Ellis & Associates, P.A., Pensacola, FL, for Maupin., Lennard B. Register, III, Tiffany Hope Eggers, U.S. Atty., Pensacola, FL, R. Bryan Wilson, U.S. Atty., Tallahassee, FL, for U.S.