United States Eleventh Circuit

In subrogation dispute arising from the flooding of a coffee storage warehouse, judgments in favor of plaintiffs are affirmed where the district court did not err in: 1) denying defendant's motion to amend; 2) admitting evidence regarding the denial of a building permit and a subsequent remedial measure; 3) denying defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law; 4) awarding additurs; 5) granting a new trial regarding actual damages; and 6) granting defendants prejudgment interest from the date of loss.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/07/2007
• Published 08/07/2007

Judges

• ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge:, Before PRYOR, KRAVITCH and ALARCÓN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Melinda S. Kollross, Clausen Miller, P.C., Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant., John J. Cavo, Lane, Reese, Aulick, Summers & Ennis, P.A., Coral Gables, FL, June Galkoski Hoffman, John M. Pennekamp, Fowler, White, Burnett, P.A., Miami, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.