United States Eleventh Circuit
Daytona Grand, Inc. v. City of Daytona Beach, 06-12022
In case involving the constitutionality of several zoning and public nudity ordinances adopted by defendant city to regulate adult theaters, order upholding zoning ordinances but striking down nudity ordinances is reversed as to the nudity ordinances where the City has carried its evidentiary burden of establishing their constitutionality because the ordinances further substantial government interests.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/28/2007
- Published 06/28/2007
Judges
- MARCUS, Circuit Judge:, Before HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and BARZILAY, Judge.
Court
- United States Eleventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Anthony Angelo Garganese, Brown, Garganese, Weiss & D'Agresta, P.A., Orlando, FL, for Florida League of Cities, Inc., Amicus Curiae., James Michael Johnson, Alliance Defense Fund of Louisiana, Shreveport, LA, for Citizens for Community Values, Amicus Curiae.
- For Appellees:
- Daniel R. Aaronson, Banjamin & Aaronson, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Gary S. Edinger, Gary S. Edinger, P.A., Gainesville, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants Cross-Appellees., Scott D. Bergthold, Law Office of Scott D. Bergthold, P.L.L.C., Chattanooga, TN, Marie Hartman, Daytona Beach, FL, for Defendant-Appellee Cross-Appellant.