Skip to main content

United States Eleventh Circuit


U.S. v. Douglas, 06-12854

Convictions and sentences for kidnapping, robbery, and carjacking are affirmed over claims that: 1) the district court improperly admitted supplemental opinions of a fingerprint expert; 2) the district court improperly denied him the right to call a witness to testify in person; 3) an in-court identification was improper; 4) there was insufficient evidence of carjacking; 5) the court erred in denying defendant's final motion for a continuance; and 6) sentencing enhancements were in error for otherwise using a firearm, for conduct not alleged or proven, and for conduct for which he was acquitted.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/19/2007
  • Published 06/19/2007

Judges

  • PER CURIAM:, Before PRYOR, KRAVITCH and ALARCÓN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Michael N. Loebl (Court-Appointed), Fulcher Hagler, LLP, Augusta, GA, for Douglas., Joshua S. Weimer, Kyle Gregory Anez Wallace, Asst. U.S Atty., Augusta, GA, Amy Lee Copeland, U.S. Atty., Savannah, GA, for U.S.

Copied to clipboard