United States Eleventh Circuit
Knight v. Alabama, 05-11527
Denial of claim that certain tax provisions of the Alabama Constitution violate the U.S. Constitution, where the provisions so seriously underfund public education in Alabama that they have a segregative effect on the state's colleges and universities, is affirmed as the challenged tax policies have not undermined the desegregative process to a level that even remotely triggers the Constitution.
Appellate Information
- Decided 01/31/2007
- Published 01/31/2007
Judges
- HILL, Circuit Judge:, Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and HILL and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eleventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- James U. Blacksher, Birmingham, AL, for Appellants., Robert D. Segall, Copeland, Franco, Screws & Gill, Mark Sabel, Sabel & Sabel, P.C., Montgomery, AL, for Amicus Curiae.
- For Appellees:
- John B. Tally, Jr., Adams & Reese/Lange Simpson, LLP, W. Braxton Schell, Jr., Robert D. Hunter, Altec, Inc., Birmingham, AL, Edward M. George, Jeffery A. Foshee, Foshee & George, L.L.C., Reginald L. Sorrells, Larry E. Craven, Darnell Delacey Coley, State of AL, Dept. of Educ., Solomon S. Seay, Jr., Montgomery, AL, Randall M. Woodrow, Doster & Woodrow, Anniston, AL, Armand Georges Derfner, Derfner, Altman & Wilborn, LLC, Charleston, SC, Fred D. Gray, Gray, Langford, Sapp, McGowan, Gray & Nathanson, Tuskegee, AL, Norma Mungenast Lemley, University of Al. System/Office of Counsel, Tuscaloosa, AL, for Appellees.