United States Eleventh Circuit

Summary judgment for defendant on intentional discrimination claim and discriminatory impact claim under the Fair Housing Act are affirmed over claims that the district court: 1) failed to consider relevant evidence of discriminatory intent; 2) was clearly in error in its finding regarding disparate impact; and 3) considered expert testimony that should have been excluded under Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/12/2006
• Published 10/12/2006

Judges

• ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge:, Before EDMONDSON, BIRCH and ALARCÓN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Kathryn M. Zickert, Marcia M. Ernst, Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Lauren MacLeod Hansford, Steven E. Rosenberg, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellee.