United States Eleventh Circuit

Dismissal of second amended complaint for failure to meet the heightened requirements of Rule 9(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, is affirmed as plaintiff county pension plan waived its right to further amendment of its complaint by taking the instant appeal.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/12/2006
• Published 10/12/2006

Judges

• ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge:, Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and BIRCH and ALARCÓN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Joseph P. Helm, III, Chitwood Harley Harnes, LLP, Martin D. Chitwood, Stuart J. Guber, Motley Rice, LLC, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Todd R. David, Jessica Perry Corley, Alston & Bird, LLP, Dan S. McDevitt, M. Robert Thornton, King & Spalding, Elizabeth Vranicar Tanis, Laurance Joseph Warco, Jason Scott Alloy, Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, Atlanta, GA, Jerome S. Hirsch, Gary J. Hacker, Joseph N. Sacca, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, LLP, New York CIty, Bruce M. Cormier, Ernst & Young, LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees.