United States Eleventh Circuit

In an ancillary action following a preliminary order of criminal forfeiture of defendant's husband's interest in certain property, summary judgment for plaintiff is affirmed over claims that the district court erred as: 1) at the time of the acts giving rise to the forfeitures, defendant held an ownership interest in at least some portion of each of the properties superior to her husband's interest; or, alternatively, 2) she was a bona fide purchaser for value of at least some portion of each of the properties.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/24/2006
• Published 08/24/2006

Judges

• PER CURIAM:, Before BLACK, BARKETT and COX, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Theresa M.B. Van Vliet, Patsy Zimmerman, Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for Soreide., Jeanne Marie Mullenhoff, Anne R. Schultz, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, FL, for U.S.