United States Eleventh Circuit

Appeal of 2004 order denying plaintiffs' motions for a preliminary injunction, against a Georgia law involving payday loans, is dismissed as moot over claims that the appeal is not moot because plaintiffs intend to develop a new consumer loan program, and the presence of the Act interferes with their ability to develop new loan products.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/28/2006
• Published 04/28/2006

Judges

• PER CURIAM:, Before CARNES, HULL and HILL, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Susan Verbonitz, Marc J. Zucker, Weir & Partners, LLP, Alan S. Kaplinsky, Jeremy T. Rosenblum, Mark J. Levin, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, William P. Eiselstein, Miller & Martin, PLLC, Christopher J. Willis, Richard H. Sinkfield, Daniel D. Zegura, Rogers & Hardin, LLP, John K. Larkins, Jr., Chilvis, Cochran, Larkins & Bever, LLP, Michael C. Russ, King & Spalding, Charles E. Campbell, McKenna, Long & Aldridge, Robert A. Bartlett, Long, Aldridge & Norman, Atlanta, GA, Larry Dwight Floyd, Jr., Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, LLP, Columbia, SC, for Plaintiffs-Appellants., James T. McIntyre, Jr., Chrys D. Lemon, McIntyre Law Firm, PLLC, Deborah M. Zuckerman, AARP Foundation Lit., Linda A. Arnsbarger, Morrison & Foerster, LLP, Washington, DC, Erin Glenn Busby, Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P., Houston, TX, Michael D. Calhoun, Center for Responsible Lending, Durham, NC, Christopher G. Browning, Jr., NC Dept. of Justice/Atty. Gen. Office, Raleigh, NC, for Amici Curiae.


• For Appellees:
  
• Thurbert Baker, Isaac Byrd, Sidney Ray Barrett, Jr., Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees.