Skip to main content

United States Eleventh Circuit


Arrington v. Helms, 04-15078

Summary judgment for agency-defendants is affirmed where plaintiffs: 1) failed as a matter of law to establish that a statute provides custodial parents individual rights, enforceable under 42 U.S.C. section 1983, to distribution of certain child support payments in strict compliance with its provisions, and 2) failed to show a violation of their procedural due process rights.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 02/13/2006
  • Published 02/13/2006

Judges

  • BLACK, Circuit Judge:, Before ANDERSON, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Brian Paddock, Paddock & Mastin, Cookeville, TN, Maryanne M. Prince, Montgomery, AL, for Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • John J. Park, Jr., Montgomery, AL, Jennifer Mims Bush, James Edward Long, Ala. Dept. of Human Resources, Sandra Ingram Speakman, State Personnel Dept.-Legal, Montgomery, AL, for Appellees.
Copied to clipboard