United States Eleventh Circuit

Summary judgment for defendants finding that plaintiffs were collaterally estopped from raising their claims by previous litigation over the scope of an easement is reversed in part as to a determination that plaintiffs were estopped from arguing that an easement limited the number of lots into which a parcel could be divided.

Appellate Information

• Decided 02/09/2006
• Published 02/09/2006

Judges

• GOLDBERG, Judge:, Before DUBINA and MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and GOLDBERG, Judge.

Court

• United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Thomas Larry Hill, Moore, Hill & Westmoreland, P.A., Pensacola, FL, for Appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Donald H. Partington, Clark, Partington, Hart, Pensacola, Larry, Bond, Stackhouse & Stone, Pensacola, FL, for Appellees.