United States Eleventh Circuit

In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action alleging the use of excessive force, denial of defendant's motion for summary judgment is reversed where defendant's authorization of a Precision Intervention Technique, which was not executed, did not violate plaintiff's constitutional rights. (Substituted opinion.)

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/23/2005
• Published 12/23/2005

Judges

• BARKETT, Circuit Judge:, Before BIRCH, BARKETT and COX, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Andrew C. Clarke, Memphis, TN, Craig Thomas Jones, Edmond & Jones, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Harris.


• For Appellees:
  
• Philip Wade Savrin, Sun S. Choy, Freeman, Mathis & Gary, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellants.