United States Eleventh Circuit
KLAY v. ALL DEFENDANTS, 03-14828
In a suit alleging that HMO's violated the RICO Act, the district court properly refused to compel arbitration where the federal policy favoring arbitration does not mandate arbitration when the parties did not agree to it.
Appellate Information
- Decided 11/05/2004
- Published 11/05/2004
Judges
- BIRCH, Circuit Judge:, Before ANDERSON and BIRCH, Circuit Judges, and LAND , District Judge.
Court
- United States Eleventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Robert D.W. Landon, III, Kenny Nachwalter, Edward Soto, Christopher R.J. Pace, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, Jeffrey B. Crockett, Jorden Burt, LLP, Miami, FL, Brian P. Brooks, O'Melveny & Myers, Audrey Anderson, Hogan & Hartson, L.L.P., John D. Aldock, Mark S. Raffman, Goodwin Procter, LLP, Washington, DC, Edward M. Crane, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Chicago, IL, Gregory S. Coleman, Lisa Royce Eskow, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, Austin, TX, James Quinn, Nicholas J. Pappas, Jeffrey S. Klein, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, New York City, Stan Blumenfeld, O'Melveny & Myers, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, William E. Grauer, Cooley Godward LLP, San Diego, CA, for Appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Othni J. Lathram, Joe R. Whatley, Jr., Charlene P. Ford, Whatley Drake, L.L.C., Birmingham, AL, James B. Tilghman, Jr., Stewart, Tilghman, Fox & Bianchi, P.A., Miami, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.