United States Eleventh Circuit

Defendant's appeal, addressing whether defendant-airline violated Title III by making its website inaccessible to the visually impaired, is dismissed where plaintiff abandoned the claim and argument it made before the district court and raised an entirely new theory, which is unreviewable by the appellate court.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/24/2004
• Published 09/24/2004

Judges

• MARCUS, Circuit Judge:, Before TJOFLAT and MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and MUSGRAVE , Judge.

Court

• United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Steven Reininger, Rasco, Reininger, Perez & Esquenazi, P.L., Matthew W. Dietz, Coral Gables, FL, Howard R. Behar, Rasco, Reininger, Perez & Esquenazi, Miami, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants., Linda M. Dardarian, Saperstein, Goldstein, Demchak, Baller, Borgen & Dardarian, Oakland, CA, Deirdre K. Mulligan, Jennifer M. Urban, University of Cal. Berkeley, Elaine B. Feingold, Law Offices of Elaine B. Feingold, Berkeley, CA, Katherine Y.K. Cheung, U.S. Foodservice, Columbia, MD, Kathryn S. Zenna, Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck & Untereiner, LLP, Washington, DC, for Amici Curiae.


• For Appellees:
  
• Katherine Renee Schimkat, Carlton Fields, P.A., Miami, FL, Garth Thomas Yearick, Carlton Fields, P.A., West Palm Beach, FL, Sylvia H. Walbolt, Carlton Fields, P.A., St. Petersburg, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.