Skip to main content

United States Eleventh Circuit


US v. KING, 02-13348

Summary judgment against defendant's Eighth Amendment claims brought under 28 U.S.C. section 1983 is reversed where genuine issues of material fact are present concerning whether defendant-warden was deliberately indifferent to plaintiff's medical needs and the inhumane housing conditions.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/14/2004
  • Published 09/14/2004

Judges

  • PER CURIAM:, Before CARNES, HULL and HILL, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Sarah M. Shalf (Court-Appointed), Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore, Atlanta, GA, for Miller., David Victor Weber, Augusta, GA, David E. Lansford, Atlanta, GA, for U.S., Sarah E. Harrington, Kevin Russell, U.S. Dept. of Justice-Civ. Rights, App., Washington, DC, for U.S.

Copied to clipboard