United States Eleventh Circuit

The EPA Order implicitly assumes that a major stationary source can be broken into parts and compliance determined individually for purposes of the Georgia Rule; it fails to acknowledge, much less justify, defining the same term, "major stationary source," in two different ways; vacated and remanded.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/05/2004
• Published 05/05/2004

Judges

• ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:, Before ANDERSON, CARNES and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Curtis A. Cox, Atlanta, GA, for Petitioner., Diane L. DeShazo, State of Georgia, Dept. of Law, Atlanta, GA, for Environmenal Protection Div., Dept. of Natural Resources, Amicus Curiae.


• For Appellees:
  
• Ellen A. Rouch, Atlanta, GA, Ammie Roseman-Orr, Joshua M. Levin, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Div., Washington, DC, for Respondents., Rita Arlene Sheffey, Charles A. Perry, Melvin Scott Schulze, Hunton & Williams, Atlanta, GA, G. Graham Holden, Tucker, GA, for Intervenor-Respondent.