Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Eleventh Circuit


KMS REST. CORP. v. WENDY'S INT'L, INC., 03-10759

Summary judgment for defendant is vacated; the fact that defendant did not act solely out of malice in interfering with plaintiff's contract with a franchisee does not preclude a finding of tortious interference under Florida law. Improper methods may support a tortious interference claim even when the defendant did not act solely out of malice.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/04/2004
  • Published 03/04/2004

Judges

  • CARNES, Circuit Judge:, Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, CARNES, Circuit Judge, and MILLS , District Judge.

Court

  • United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Edna L. Caruso,Caruso, Burlington, Bohn & Compiani, P.A., West Palm Beach, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Chilton Davis Varner, Dwight J. Davis, King & Spalding, Atlanta, GA, Walter J. Tache, Zuckerman, Spaeder, Taylor & Evans, LLP, Miami, FL, Michael J. Canter, William D. Kloss, Jr., Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, LLP, Columbus, OH, for Defendant-Appellee.
Copied to clipboard