Skip to main content

United States Eleventh Circuit


DOWNEY v. MORTGAGE GUAR. INS. CORP., 01-15857

Although anticipated attorneys' fees may properly be included within an appellate cost bond issued by a district court pursuant to either Fed. R. App. P. 7 or the court's inherent power, such inclusion was error because the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act's fee-shifting provision does not define "costs" to include attorneys' fees.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/09/2002
  • Published 12/09/2002

Judges

  • MARCUS, Circuit Judge:, Before BLACK and MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and UNGARO-BENAGES , District Judge.

Court

  • United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Paul S. Rothstein,Paul S. Rothstein & Associates, N. Albert Bacharach, Jr., Gainesville, FL, for Movants-Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Michael D. Calhoun, Gulley & Calhoun, Charles A. Bentley, Jr., Bentley & Associates, P.A., Durham, NC, Thomas W. Tucker, Dye, Tucker, Everitt, Long & Brewton, P.A., Augusta, GA, Melinda Lawrence, Patterson, Harkavy & Lawrence, L.L.P., Raleigh, NC, Mark D. Johnson, Gilbert, Harrell, Gilbert, Sumerford & Martin, P.C., Brunswick, GA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Copied to clipboard