United States Eleventh Circuit
RIDER v SANDOZ PHARM. CORP., 01-11965
Expert testimony, purporting to link the drug Parlodel with hemorrhagic stroke, was inadmissible to prove causation, where the testimony was not sufficiently reliable to meet the standards established by Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., 509 U.S. 579.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/25/2002
- Published 06/25/2002
Judges
- RONEY, Circuit Judge:, Before ANDERSON, HULL and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eleventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Bert Black, Diamond, McCarthy, Taylor & Finley, Dallas, TX, Ellen Relkin, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., New York City, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Joe G. Hollingsworth, Katharine R. Latimer, Scott S. Thomas, Spriggs & Hollingsworth, Washington, DC, Lawrence J. Myers, Smith Moore LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees.