Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Eleventh Circuit


RIDER v SANDOZ PHARM. CORP., 01-11965

Expert testimony, purporting to link the drug Parlodel with hemorrhagic stroke, was inadmissible to prove causation, where the testimony was not sufficiently reliable to meet the standards established by Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., 509 U.S. 579.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/25/2002
  • Published 06/25/2002

Judges

  • RONEY, Circuit Judge:, Before ANDERSON, HULL and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Bert Black, Diamond, McCarthy, Taylor & Finley, Dallas, TX, Ellen Relkin, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., New York City, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Joe G. Hollingsworth, Katharine R. Latimer, Scott S. Thomas, Spriggs & Hollingsworth, Washington, DC, Lawrence J. Myers, Smith Moore LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Copied to clipboard