Skip to main content

United States Eleventh Circuit


CASTRO v. US, 01-12181

When a district court re-characterizes a federal prisoner's post-conviction motion as a petition under 28 USC 2255, is does not render the prisoner's subsequent attempt to file a petition under 28 USC 2255 a "second or successive petition" subject to the AEDPA.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 01/02/2002
  • Published 01/02/2002

Judges

  • WILSON, Circuit Judge:, Before WILSON, RONEY and FAY, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Michael G. Frick,Norman Daniel Lovein, Hall, Booth, Smith & Slover, PC, Brunswick, GA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Amy Lee Copeland, Savannah, GA, for Respondent-Appellee.
Copied to clipboard