United States Eleventh Circuit

A superseding indictment that required defendant to defend himself against a conspiracy involving at least eight separate smuggling ventures, instead of just the one episode charged in the initial indictment, may not refer back to original indictment for statute of limitations purposes.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/26/2001
• Published 03/26/2001

Judges

Court

• United States Eleventh Circuit

Counsel