United States Tenth Circuit
Safeco Ins. Co. of Am. v. Hilderbrand, 08-3225
In an action by an insurer seeking a declaration that it was not required to provide coverage to a defendant in an underlying suit regarding a person who was attacked by a tiger, judgment for plaintiff is affirmed where the homeowners policy did not apply to defendants' exotic animal rescue and exhibition business, nor did any other exception in the policy apply to the facts of the case.
Appellate Information
- Decided 04/12/2010
- Published 04/12/2010
Judges
- TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge., Before KELLY, EBEL, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Tenth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Thomas M. Warner, Jr., Warner Law Offices, P.A., Wichita, KS, for Appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Paul Hasty, Jr., Schmitt, Manz, Swanson, Mulhern, Overland Park, KS, for Appellee.