United States Tenth Circuit

Defendant's sentence for theft of public money is affirmed where: 1) it was reasonable for the presentence report to recommend, and the district court to agree, that the sanction for defendant's offense needed to be more than losing his right to hunt; and 2) the sentence was not procedurally unreasonable because little explanation was required for a within-guidelines sentence.

Appellate Information

• Decided 02/12/2010
• Published 02/12/2010

Judges

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel