United States Tenth Circuit
US v. Masek, 08-1296
Defendant's wire fraud sentence and restitution order are affirmed where: 1) defendant did not present evidence to bring the reliability of the government witnesses' conservative estimates regarding the loss caused by defendant or the district court's findings into doubt; and 2) the Sentencing Guidelines did not require a civil settlement amount to be credited against the loss figure for the purposes of calculating the sentencing range.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/10/2009
- Published 12/10/2009
Judges
- LUCERO, Circuit Judge., Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Tenth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Thomas P. Sleisenger, Law Offices of Thomas P. Sleisenger, Los Angeles, CA, for the Defendant-Appellant., John M. Hutchins (David M. Gaouette and Robert Mydans with him on the briefs), Office of the United States Attorney, Denver, CO, for the Plaintiff-Appellee.