United States Tenth Circuit

In a trade secret misappropriation action, partial judgment for plaintiffs and defendants is affirmed in part where plaintiff failed to present adequate claims of tortious interference with contract and prospective business advantage. The ruling is reversed in part, however, where the question of whether defendant's manufacturing process was a trade secret was a question of fact that could not be resolved on the current record.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/11/2009
• Published 08/11/2009

Judges

• HOLMES, Circuit Judge., Before KELLY, HOLLOWAY, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Andrew M. Low (Janet A. Savage, Richard P. Holme, and Elizabeth H. Titus with him on the briefs) of Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP, Denver, CO, for Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee., Theresa L. Corrada of Issacson Rosenbaum P.C., Denver, CO, (Byeongsook Seo of Isaacson Rosenbaum P.C., Denver, CO, and John A. Culver of Benezra & Culver, L.L.C., Lakewood, CO, with her on the briefs) for Plaintiff-Count erclaim-Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.