United States Tenth Circuit
Haynes Trane Serv. Agency v. Am. Std., Inc., 07-1441
In an action for breach of a franchise agreement, judgment for Defendant is affirmed, where 1) Plaintiff presented insufficient evidence that his franchise agreement had been modified; and 2) Plaintiff's unclean hands gave the District Court authority to deny him an equitable estoppel remedy.
Appellate Information
- Decided 07/06/2009
- Published 07/06/2009
Judges
- Before HARTZ, TYMKOVICH and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Tenth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Marcy G. Glenn, Holland & Hart LLP, Denver, CO, (Christopher A. Crisman, Holland & Hart LLP; J. Lawrence Hamil and Charles B. Hecht, Hamil/Hecht LLP, Denver, CO, with her on the briefs) for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Daniel M. Reilly (Larry S. Pozner, Sean Connelly, Kent C. Modesitt, and Clare Pennington, with him on the brief), of Reilly Pozner & Connelly LLP, Denver, CO, for Defendant-Appellee.