United States Tenth Circuit

In a Title VII sex discrimination action, summary judgment for Defendant is affirmed, where: 1) there was no evidence of quid pro quo sexual harassment; and 2) Plaintiff's termination could not be traced back to Plaintiff's supervisor under the subordinate-bias theory.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/16/2009
• Published 04/16/2009

Judges

• PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge., Before KELLY, EBEL, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• David Lane of Killmer, Lane & Newman, L.L.P., Denver, CO, for Plaintiff-Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Douglas Cox, Assistant Attorney General (John W. Suthers, Attorney General, on the brief), Denver, CO, for Defendant-Appellee.