Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Tenth Circuit


Smith v. Workman, 05-6206

Death row inmate's habeas petition was properly denied where: 1) his attorney's failure to request a mental health expert at the trial's mitigation phase did not constitute ineffective assistance; 2) the trial court's failure to provide such an expert at the guilt/innocence phase was not wrongful; 3) counsel's performance at the mitigation phase was objectively reasonable given that his investigation attempts were thwarted by his client; and 4) a due process challenge was procedurally barred.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/30/2008
  • Published 12/30/2008

Judges

  • PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge., Before TACHA, KELLY, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Timothy Payne, Assistant Federal Public Defender (James A. Drummond, Supervising Assistant Federal Public Defender, Capital Habeas Unit, on the briefs), Oklahoma City, OK, for Petitioner-Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Jennifer Strickland, Assistant Attorney General (W.A. Drew Edmondson, Attorney General, on the brief), Oklahoma City, OK, for Respondent-Appellee.
Copied to clipboard