United States Tenth Circuit

In a child pornography prosecution, the district court's revocation of defendant's supervised release is affirmed where, by engaging in several activities that were not permitted by his sex offender treatment provider, defendant did not "participate" in the treatment program and thus violated its terms.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/21/2009
• Published 10/21/2009

Judges

• EBEL, Circuit Judge., Before KELLY, EBEL, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Vicki Mandell-King, Assistant Federal Public Defender, (Raymond P. Moore, Federal Public Defender, Denver, CO, with her on the brief) for Defendant-Appellant David Gary Metzener., Michael C. Johnson, Assistant United States Attorney, (David M. Gaouette, Acting United States Attorney, Denver, CO, with him on the brief) for Plaintiff-Appellee United States of America.