United States Tenth Circuit

In an asylum case involving a Chinese citizen, petition for review of a denial of her second motion to reopen is denied where: 1) the BIA did not abuse its discretion in determining that petitioner failed to present any new material evidence of changed country conditions; and 2) changed personal circumstances cannot support an untimely motion to reopen after a final order of removal.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/07/2008
• Published 11/10/2008

Judges

• HARTZ, Circuit Judge., Before MURPHY, BRORBY, and HARTZ, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Submitted on the briefs: , Lorance Hockert, New York, NY, for Petitioner.


• For Appellees:
  
• Mark C. Walters, Assistant Director, and W. Manning Evans, Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.