United States Tenth Circuit

In a bankruptcy case, decision rejecting appellant's objection to appellee's claim that it was liable to appellee on certain equipment leases is affirmed over claims that the bankruptcy court: 1) erred in concluding appellant had no right to test certain sprinklers before the obligation to notify appellee accrued; 2) erred in deciding the case on issues appellant claimed were not included in a pretrial order or any other pleading; and 3) abused its discretion in denying appellant's Motion to Reconsider.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/04/2008
• Published 11/05/2008

Judges

• SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge., Before BRISCOE, SEYMOUR and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• William E. Metcalf of Metcalf & Justus, Topeka, Kansas, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Richard Petersen-Klein (Justice B. King and Donald Patterson with him on the brief) of Fisher, Patterson, Sayler & Smith, Topeka, Kansas, for Appellee.