United States Tenth Circuit

A conviction for armed bank robbery and related offenses is affirmed where: 1) there was no violation of the Speedy Trial Act since there was no grand jury in session when time to file the indictment would have otherwise expired; 2) the owner of the house where defendant was residing had authority to consent to a voluntary search of the premises, and evidence obtained in the search was valid; 3) an in-court identification procedure was not unconstitutionally suggestive when the defendant was ordered to wear sunglasses and a black hood in front of the jury.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/05/2008
• Published 05/05/2008

Judges

• PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge., Before KELLY, ANDERSON, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Leena Alam, Assistant United States Attorney (David E. O'Meilia, United States Attorney, Northern District of Oklahoma, on the brief), Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Fred Lynn, Tulsa, OK, for Defendant-Appellant.