United States Tenth Circuit

In an action seeking reformation of an automobile insurance contract, summary judgment in favor of defendant-insurer is affirmed where reformation was not available under the circumstances, as enhanced personal injury protection coverage was offered to plaintiff, and the offer was sufficient under the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/24/2007
• Published 08/27/2007

Judges

• TACHA, Chief Judge., Before TACHA, Chief Judge, MURPHY and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Submitted on the briefs: , Robert B. Carey, Frances R. Johnson, The Carey Law Firm, Colorado Springs, CO, for Plaintiff-Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Meloney Cargil Perry, Baker & McKenzie, Dallas, TX, and Gregory K. Falls, Deisch, Marion & Klaus, P.C., Denver, CO, for Defendant-Appellee.