Skip to main content

United States Tenth Circuit


Hackwell v. US, 05-1509

In an action challenging a regulation that interprets the attorney's fee limitations set forth by the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA), dismissal for failure to state a claim is reversed and remanded where the regulation is contrary to the RECA's plain language and is therefore invalid.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/05/2007
  • Published 07/06/2007

Judges

  • HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge., Before BRISCOE, HOLLOWAY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Jeffrey Robert White of Center for Constitutional Litigation, P.C., Washington D.C. (J. Keith Killian and Damon J. Davis of Killian, Guthro & Jensen, P.C., Grand Junction, Colorado, with him on the briefs) for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Elizabeth Goitein (Peter D. Keisler and Mark B. Stern, with her on the brief), United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for Defendants-Appellees.
Copied to clipboard