United States Tenth Circuit

Denial of defendant-police officer's motion to dismiss based on qualified immunity is affirmed over claims that the district court erred by: 1) holding that plaintiff possessed a constitutionally protected privacy interest in the contents of a video depicting her alleged rape; 2) holding that her constitutional privacy interest was clearly established; and 3) consequently rejecting defendant's contention that he was entitled to qualified immunity from suit.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/14/2006
• Published 11/15/2006

Judges

• PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge., Before KELLY, HOLLOWAY, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Rickey J. Knighton II, (Jeff Harley Bryant and Susan D. Rogers, on the briefs), Norman, OK, for Defendant-Appellant., Michael C. Salem, Norman, OK, for Plaintiff-Appellee.